Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 13:04

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Kuorans can you write a sad story about kpop?
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is the best way to keep my vagina clean and fresh?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
With 2026 World Cup a year away, the USMNT is directionless - Yahoo Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 launch: GameStop investigating claims of console damage - NBC News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Here's What To Expect From A New COVID Variant Going Around - BuzzFeed
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Switzerland proposes forcing UBS to add $26bn in capital - Financial Times